Do they exist? Or, is it a convenient way to denigrate and dismiss and discourage them from coming to these shores? After all, this is our Land of English, Scots, Welsh and Irish who went all over the globe to bring them the Gospel of Salvation and Capitalism and made them little Colonial subjects and slaves to make our millions.
500 years of Empire building and slavery to make the Brits the owners of the biggest and best empire in the existence of the world. We went there in exploration, trade and war to sort them all out. And now they want to come HERE! The cheek of it!
In India we did nothing over the two great Bengal famines of 1770 and 1943. The last, out of fear, perhaps. Churchill thought that if Japan invaded they would take the food meant for the Bengalis. And, anyway, Indians were barely human and certainly no more than chattles/objects when being our unpaid slaves.
“The Bengal famine of 1943 was completely because of policy failure,” Mishra said. Policy lapses such as prioritizing distribution of vital supplies to the military, stopping rice imports and not declaring that it was actually a famine were among the factors that led to the magnitude of the tragedy, he added.
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/29/asia/churchill-bengal-famine-intl-scli-gbr/index.html#:~:text=This%20Indian%20family%20arrived%20in%20Kolkata%20in%201943%20in%20search%20of%20food.&text=Winston%20Churchill's%20policies%20caused%20a,the%20origins%20of%20the%20disaster.
In hotels, to be fair on ourselves, we did go so far as to put up notices asking English gentlemen to refrain from hitting the servants. However, this did not restrain General Dyer (or, today's big friend Binni Netanyahu) from slaughtering the Indians who had the temerity to protest, unarmed, passively, totally non-violently on one occasion in Amritsar in 1919. In fact, Daily Telegraph readers had a whip round and raised thousands of pounds to comfort the General when he faced some criticism back home. He said that he only stopped shooting when his troops ran out of bullets. Did he use the money to buy more ammo?
The Brits 'Greatest Britton Who Has Ever Lived', on BBC TV in the year 2000, was somewhat scathing over Indian independence leader, Gandhi who was the exact opposite of our 'Greatest Britton Who Has Ever Lived'. However, no one recognised or gave him any credit for his very successful non-violence that made our Rule of the Indians like a walk in the park. Albeit, some expense in ammunition lost in firing on them. And in having to build railways to help our troops move around the vast sub-continent to control them more easily.
The Nationality and Borders Bill 2021 on asylum legislation is not consistent with an article in the 1951 Refugee Convention that specifically states that is not allowed to penalise asylum seekers on account of illegal entry or presence? UN Relief Agency, many years ago said that our Cons/Lab governments' draconian asylum legislation was not consistent with the Convention and must be challenged in the courts.
Earlier this century, we allowed in 29,000 Afghan asylum seekers to become refugees and to stay in the UK. The Afghan Resettlement Programme was modelled on the Syrian one.
Penalising asylum seekers arriving by boat and lorry is inadmissable and should be removed. There are clearly not enough safe and legal routes for those fleeing war-torn countries and those escaping persecution and uninhabitable living conditions.
All this according to Peter Walsh and Dominic Casciani.