Showing posts with label Chris Packham. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Packham. Show all posts

Sunday, 14 February 2021

Fear not. FRASER PITHIE will have all the answers.

This is most helpful with its counter-arguments, Fraser.  How do you counter my fear that we will still need the same number of intercity trains as now, to cater for those passengers who wish to stop at the majority of stations that HS2 does not stop at?

Is HS2 like flying through the air on land?  Why not stop destroying our current railway lines, like the half-finished, half used, 120 Kms Black Country Railway and use planes for flying through the air?

How do you counter Bill Gates who says that around 10% of greenhouse gas emissions come from the manufacture of steel and cement?

What is your answer as to how we must not be too concerned about ever-rising greenhouse gases from infrastructure spending to frivolous spending?

Is it permissible to argue that yet more soil disappearing under steel, concrete, brick and tarmac is, in effect, burying nature when humans are very much part of nature and, therefore, we need nature to work properly for our own survival?

How do you counter Chris Packham's ten points against HS2? 

You wrote, "We have only half the railway track that we had in 1963."  Would you say that this is a very sad reflection on everyone in the railway industry in losing so much of their livelihood so carelessly?  How do you explain this serious oversight, Fraser?

What is the proportion or length lost to trams, please in the seven towns and cities of the UK that have trams to further mix up, in confusion, our multi-modal transport system?

How is it that Dudley is the largest town in the UK without a railway station but it only gets a tram stop (and £28 m National Innovation Centre), instead of train station, for its 150-year railway "of national strategic significance"?

Builders prefer to build homes on greenfield sites.  And, to build railways on greenfield sites, too - if they're sufficiently wealth flaunting and prestigious.  They say, "We're not going to bother with freight only or mothballed railway lines.  They're old hat and 19th century.  We want something that is more expensive and flash than Maglev train projects in China, Japan and South Korea."  So we go for trams on the UK's last, mothballed mainline, "of national strategic significance" 120 Kms between Worcester, the Black Country and Derby.  And trams are the second most expensive mode to construct after HS2 at over £200 m/Km.  The current W Mids Metro Eastside extension, that is being built, is £133 m/Km.  Even more expensive than most Maglevs!

Saturday, 11 July 2020

You believe in Packham; believe also in me!!


Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 08:51
Subject: Re: ALWAYS OPPOSE HS2/METRO TRAM EXTENSIONS
To: Tim Weller <timweller1@gmail.com>

Such a good summary! Jonathon Porritt.
On 9 Jul 2020, at 08:20, Tim Weller <timweller1@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear friends - my own 10 points, following Packham's ten!
  1. Please continue to support Chris Packham and fund him over our opposition to £106 billion HS2.
  2. Please continue to be on my side over misspending £15 billion on Metro tram extensions in W Midlands.
  3. Both are over-indulgent, vanity projects.
  4. Both are grossly extravagant, flash, puff out your chest, waste.
  5. Both break our UK laws and international obligations over postponing climate catastrophe.
  6. Metro is the second most expensive transport mode to construct after HS2, per Km.
  7. Metro is even more expensive per Km than almost all Maglev train projects in China, S Korea and Japan.
  8. The more we spend, the more deadly greenhouse gases are emitted.
  9. Both Metro and HS2, like Brexit, are the wrong issues and make the right issues worse.
  10. The right issues are addressing resource depletion and the ecological and climate emergencies.

WATCH PACKHAM: