A full century and more of wars, courtesy of the people of violence in the Jewish/Christian world in 1914 through to today! Perhaps, the Quakers, the Mennonites, the Amish and the JWs know something that the rest of Christendom don't?
This foolish, first world war, from the adherents of the Jewish/Christian Bible, has meant that these good people have, so far, had 112 years of warfare around the globe to bring many millions of humans to have a premature end to their lives. A planet of people at war with itself, despite having the Bible example and teaching to live by! Or are the violent, unacceptable parts of the Good Book, part of the problem?
Professor Gary Sheffield, in his 2014 book, 'A Short History of the First World War', believes the values that led to the 1914 war are different from those of 112 years on. He wrote,
"We should try to see the First World War as contemporaries viewed it and seek to avoid excessive use of hindsight and the imposing of 21st century values on individual who lived 100 years ago." Page 3
Don't we need to have excessive use of morality and conscience? Values don't change. Greed for land, resources and domination of others is unchanging down the centuries. The rich and powerful Judeo-Christian nations are most at fault for using military might to get their way. The weak and powerless most likely to meet an untimely end. It was forever thus!
Again from Gary, "All historical writings must be judged in the context of the period in which they were produced."
This sounds so fine. However, human behaviour does not change from one generation to the next. Right and wrong are unchanging as we see with the values of the Ten Commandments, written about 3,500 years ago but still valid and both upheld and broken today. Killing is wrong whether it is murder or done by elected politicians telling individuals to go and kill as part of the much loved government armed forces.
Page 3 title, 'The rise of German power' shows a refreshing lack of paranoia at the end of the 19th century before the 'strange' Kaiser got going in 1888. Gary tells us that the lack of paranoia was down to Bismark's skill in orchestrating "a new international equilibrium" amongst the leaders of Britain, France, Austria-Hungary and Russia. But all too soon undone.
On page 194, we read Gary wrote a letter in 'praise' of the world war, entitled "It was a great war. One that saved Europe". 'The Times', 1 Feb 2014
Gary lays into people like me, on page xii: "the First World War prompts people (like me) to go public with views based on emotion, limited knowledge and flawed understanding." Hence, I play into his hands by asserting that it is the people of violence who are far too ready to use violence to get their way. It is called the militarisation of diplomacy. Warfare is popular with the public and popular leaders like Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair have used 'success' in war to cash in on that. PM Keir Starmer needs a war to boost his popularity. Strong, warring PMs are much loved by the electorate.
When you have military might and power, it is all too tempting to use it to get your way. Hence, WAR. Unbalanced men like the Kaiser Wilhelm II who reigned (and thought he ruled) in Germany from 1888 to 1918, Adolf Hitler and Donald Trump are good examples of "not all there" (Lord Salisbury concluded on meeting the Kaiser in 1891). See page 4 for further examples of the Kaiser being "possibly mentally unbalanced."
from 'Preface' - quotes:
"sowed the seeds of fascism in Italy and Germany"
"It killed millions and brought the world, albeit not directly, to an even greater conflagration."
"It facilitated the rise of the USA to global power and so made capitalist democracy an ideological force to contend with Soviet Marxist-Leninism, setting the scene for the Cold War."
"The result of an appallingly destructive war was a post-1918 world that was less than ideal. This led into a sense of futility, that the war had not been worth fighting."
"The Empire, not Europe was where potential threats lay."
From the last two lines of page 174, Gary quotes the common view that "a second round of hostilities (became) inevitable." He says that this is too simplistic and the Wall Street Crash of 1929 and the Great Depression brought the economic crisis and "aided the electoral growth of the Nazis." Page 175
I maintain there was unfinished business with the unsatisfactory conclusion of the war so evenly balanced for four years but only one culprit getting it in the neck with reparations, to leave bitterness and revenge. It could have gone either way at different points, even from 1914 onwards. Not one side should have thought they had won. All of humanity lost out - big time - and it has never ended, to this very day.
Website: www.garysheffield-historian.com can no longer be found.
Publisher: Oneworld Publications