Showing posts with label Stourbridge Shuttle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stourbridge Shuttle. Show all posts

Saturday, 27 February 2021

More ways to spend money & get nowhere

Hi Tim.

Hope you are well.

I would like to bring to your attention, this article which appeared on the web regarding how much money this nutter of a mayor & the transport authority is applying for to the government to fund forthcoming transport projects in the East/ West Midlands.

SUMMARY BY SELF of what train driver, Dave wrote, below:
25% of Snow Hill station was converted from use by commuter trains for use by grandiose "bus on rails" trams in the 1990s.  This, when the tram could have gone down the side of the station, even then, as it now does.  But all too late!  Bringing back the 25% is to cost a colossal £27 m but, when that will be done is anybody's guess.

THE MAN WHO KNOWS, writes:
The item which really caught my eye is the cost of reinstatement of platform 4 at Birmingham Snow hill for returning services back to heavy rail.
According to this article, the cost to do this is £27million, yes, £27million.
All this to relay a few yards of track and to alter the signalling and is not expected to be completed until 2026.
Now the question is, when Snow hill was reopened by the West Midlands transport authority,  with funds paid for by the government as the railway was still run by British railway, who was the individual, or group of individuals who made the decision to allow the Metro from Wolverhampton to convert platform 4 at Snow hill for it to gain access into Snow hill station, when  there was space at the side of the station (the route it uses now to gain access to the city centre) without the need to abolish platform 4?
Would this individual or group of individuals like to offer an explanation to the public why they are now begging for £27million  of public money to reinstate this platform ? 
Or will they remain in hiding until all this gets blown over or forgotten about?
In my opinion, the cost of this scheme should be funded by the Metro alliance, use private money, after all, it was for their benefit it was closed in the first place.

SUMMARY BY SELF of what Dave has written, below:
Trains from Coventry to Leicester were popular for 100 years.  That was stopped to give priority to fast intercity trains.  That 'do it cheap and quick' blunder has been acknowledged and the 'experts' want to reinstate Coventry to Leicester by bypassing Nuneaton for the basement bargain price of only £5 m!

THE TRAIN DRIVER WHO KNOWS, writes:
Another interesting point is the scheme to run services to the East Midlands from Coventry.
These services used to run in Pe-privatised and Privatised days from Coventry to Leicester, Nottingham, and Lincoln.
These services would run via Nuneaton which required a reversal of train direction to gain access to the line to Leicester.
When the West Coast Mainline was upgraded to allow Virgin to run faster & more frequent services, Nuneaton East junction was remodelled and the crossover was removed.
This means that now there’s no access for trains arriving at Nuneaton from Coventry to carry on their journey to Leicester and beyond.
However, this has not deterred the Transport authority who want to run a service to Leicester from Coventry, but now does not want it to call at Nuneaton ( which has connections to the north ).
The only way they can do this is to link the Coventry line with the Leicester line by means of a flyover or tunnel under the West coast main line.
This would not be a cheap solution.
Would be far better to re alter the junction at Nuneaton and return to services running as they did before.

So there you have it, two examples of how people who hold position on these authorities to make decisions costing taxpayers millions of pounds and have no knowledge of transport needs as they claim to have.

MY SUMMARY:  The Pre-Metro, ultra-light rail, gas and flywheel powered Stourbridge Shuttle, is planned to bridge the gap left by the light rail "bus on rails" tram terminating at Brierley Hill town centre.  This slow, shuttle tram shuttles passengers on a successful for a 100 years, mainline railway between Stourbridge Jct on the mainline, to drop passengers off at Harts' Hill to get the light rail "bus on rails" Metro tram to Wednesbury on the same mainline railway!  You then change to the bus to get to Walsall railway station.  In the 21st century, we get two changes when from the 19th century for 100 years none were necessary to get all the way to Walsall and, even to Derby, direct from Stourbridge Jct!

We do have to travel less, to lockdown, for both Covid and Climate but this is getting ridiculous.  No wonder people just jump in the car!

THE MAN WHO KNOWS, writes:
As I send this to you pre metro operations company at Stourbridge are now applying to run a light rail service from Stourbridge to Round oak on the existing portion of the Stourbridge to Walsall freight line.
No doubt this will be approved by this nutter of a mayor and his cronies at the transport authority.
I guess the light vehicles they use will be tested on the new portion of line from Dudley to Harts' Hill, then taken by road transport to Stourbridge.

You couldn’t make all this up? 
Total incompetence by the authorities and the idiots who run them.
As I’ve said before Tim, we have no hope.

Regards 
Dave.

Wednesday, 19 June 2019

Extend the Stourbridge Shuttle but NOT on the Black Country Railway!

I do want to see the Stourbridge Shuttle extended via the half used 350 space car park on Stourbridge Road; then along Coventry St and High St, back to the bus station.  Phil Tonks seems to like this idea from his reply to my email.  John Parry said he would not oppose it.  I should hope not!

John Parry's PPM is not suitable for a 120 Kms mainline railway of national importance.  It is the UK's only mothballed, easily reinstated, half finished, everything is there as regards every bridge, tunnel and viaduct bypass railway "of national strategic significance".  Nor is a Metro tram or a tram train (still a tram) suitable for a mainline railway of the likes of ours that runs between Worcester and Derby via Dudley Castle Hill/Castle Gate.  A tram and tram train are both suitable for the 20 Kms between Sheffield Cathedral and Rotherham Parkgate.  Both the tram and the tram train stop at every tram stop on those 20 Kms.  It is ludicrous to spoil our mainline railway that runs parallel to or close to M5/M6 by putting trams and tram trains that must stop, on average, every 650 metres through the urban Black Country.

Trams are called "bus on rails" by the national tram promotion group that has its HQ at Transport HQ at 16 Summer Lane.  Hence, the trams for over £1.5 BILLION now replacing buses and trains in Brum and the Black Country.

Connect Stourbridge Jct and Brierley Hill with a commuter TRAIN not tram of any kind, please.  You all want the tram from Brierley Hill to Wednesbury that you will get, it seems.  Main work starts in the third quarter of this year.  However, connect Wednesbury and Burton on Trent with commuter and regional TRAINS.  After Metro goes on a total of 6.7 Kms, this still leaves a total of 49.3 Kms AND Railfuture's nine railway stations for the settlements that are desperate for their railway line back to relieve motorway and main road congestion.

You will then have a train-tram-train mainline railway "of national strategic significance", at best.  This will be a world first, I understand.  It is not something the UK should be proud of or, noted for around the world.  Such a bizarre use of an important, national, mainline railway will mean something else for the UK to be seen as a laughing stock around the world!

I am available to see Qadar (perhaps Patrick, too?) at anytime and any date over the next three weeks, except morning 20 June to 1200 hrs; from 1100 hrs on Mon 24 June to 1300 hrs and Friday morning 28 June - WMCA AGM in Brum.  And I can't do Monday morning 1 July in the third week.

Best wishes