Showing posts with label aggression. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aggression. Show all posts
Wednesday, 14 October 2015
Who are the real terrorists?
It is OUR side which keeps going to war in the Middle East to keep our streets safe from terrorists. If we initiate the wars without UN approval, does that not make us the real terrorists? Is our aggression not inviting revenge attacks from those who are at the sharp end of our warring? Does the US of Aggression and its 51st state (UK or United Killers) not have the worst record for killing the most foreigners - and, in their own country, too?!
Saturday, 22 February 2014
Coercion, force, violence is ...
... hardwired, I believe into Britain and the West; into Church and State; into both society and the individual psyche. Therefore, we have had for every single year for, at least the last one hundred years, the killing of foreigners and, in their own lands, too; and by us good, decent, heroic Brits, too!
The 20th century saw more killings by the West of our fellow human beings than in all the previous years of humanity added together. What sheer aggression, violence and pure evil in us upright and so, oh so democratic and freedom loving peoples!
The ever so Great Britain had the greatest empire the world had ever seen in 1914. Kitchener had led the more recent colonial wars. Therefore, it was the normal done thing to go to war. It was the obvious thing to do when an upstart European country was wanting to rival the Great Empire of Britain and to acquire some nations for itself. 33,000 enlisted on one day alone in September 1914 and over one million men had volunteered by Christmas. "They volunteered out of a sense of patriotic duty", Jeremy Paxman said on 'Britain's Great War'. "It was a massive rush to arms", before it was all over by Christmas.
The European Union came out of centuries of European nations fighting wars with each other and around the globe; wars ordered and taxed by their representatives of God on earth - the divinely appointed and approved royal monarchs. The grand climax of the West's World War in two parts, finally shook the war mongering Europeans into economic and some political union to have, at last, permanent peace with each other, at least.
The least you and I can do is to give to the British Red Cross and the Disasters Emergency Committee. And, of course, avoid employment in armaments and the armed forces.
The 20th century saw more killings by the West of our fellow human beings than in all the previous years of humanity added together. What sheer aggression, violence and pure evil in us upright and so, oh so democratic and freedom loving peoples!
The ever so Great Britain had the greatest empire the world had ever seen in 1914. Kitchener had led the more recent colonial wars. Therefore, it was the normal done thing to go to war. It was the obvious thing to do when an upstart European country was wanting to rival the Great Empire of Britain and to acquire some nations for itself. 33,000 enlisted on one day alone in September 1914 and over one million men had volunteered by Christmas. "They volunteered out of a sense of patriotic duty", Jeremy Paxman said on 'Britain's Great War'. "It was a massive rush to arms", before it was all over by Christmas.
The European Union came out of centuries of European nations fighting wars with each other and around the globe; wars ordered and taxed by their representatives of God on earth - the divinely appointed and approved royal monarchs. The grand climax of the West's World War in two parts, finally shook the war mongering Europeans into economic and some political union to have, at last, permanent peace with each other, at least.
The least you and I can do is to give to the British Red Cross and the Disasters Emergency Committee. And, of course, avoid employment in armaments and the armed forces.
Labels:
20th century,
aggression,
British Red Cross,
Brits,
Church,
democracy,
Disasters Emergency Committee,
psyche,
State,
West
Thursday, 22 August 2013
The new Sovereign is commanded to keep to the royal Law contained in the Bible
From Wikipedia:
At the Coronation, for a thousand years, there is included this part:
"Once the taking of the oath concludes, an ecclesiastic presents a Bible to the Sovereign, saying 'Here is Wisdom; This is the royal Law; These are the lively Oracles of God.'[24]"
What a pity the Monarchs, down the centuries, have not been more zealous in keeping to God's Law contained in the Bible.
Or, perhaps they have, with this Book of books containing the most bloodthirsty chapters of murder and genocide, including Rules for Waging Holy War in Deuteronomy 20 v 1-20. We have God commanding the most extraordinary episodes of aggression against other nations that is unique among the world's religious Scriptures.
Down the centuries, English/UK and European monarchs have certainly enthusiastically embraced these unholy examples of God's work. Hence, those centuries of European warfare, culminated in the two world wars. Actually, wars about empire, domination and defending the parts of the planet under our ownership against other European nations. The exact opposite of temptation no 3 that Jesus Christ rejected but, not our monarchs and rulers and our masters who, of course, always know better.
Labels:
aggression,
Bible,
Coronation,
genocide,
monarch,
Scripture,
Sovereign
Monday, 7 January 2013
The UK Independence from America and Israel Party
It seems to me that we get into such a lather about being ruled by Europe and losing our sovereignty that we are already semi-detached from them and much more in union with America and Israel. For years, we have been fully attached to the United States of Aggression and their well funded and supported, 52nd state, Israel. The UK is the officially unrecognised 51st state with our special relationship, our common language, films, Christian faith and strong kinship with Israel and the Jews; and, of course, our solid support for every war our American friends fight after they fought and won for us (with the Russians) the 2nd World War. We still sent armaments to the US during the sixteen years of the Vietnam War, although not troops that time.
One 'Thought for the Day' contributor (on Radio 4's 'Today') said we have attacked or bombed or occupied 23 countries since the end of the 2nd World War. Caroline Lucas MP related part of the full list on 'Any Questions' and not one other panelist disagreed with her. If our friend and ally, Israel is included, it is even more than this, of course. Leonie and Emily, Yr 11 pupils at Lambeth Academy, seemed to think that the UK in its time, had NOT invaded only 22 out of nearly 200 countries in the world!! (Radio 4's 'BH' on 20 January 2013 in an amusing piece called 'Teenagers Fight Back')
After all that, not surprisingly, the White House would like us to stay in the EU to continue to represent the Anglo-American world view and to keepEurope on side (the US/UK side). ‘Today’ 10 Jan 2013
The European Courts of Justice and of Human Rights, alone makes our membership of the European Union worthwhile. Officially leave the EU and we lose them both.
Europe has a transport system that is much better than ours. We would do well to learn how they do their superb railway system, instead of ours being like the poor American rail network. Chief Executive of Network Rail, Sir David Higgins said on 'Today' on the 8 January 2013, "We still have a Victorian rail network ... we have 500 Victorian signal boxes." The McNulty Report of 2010 stated that our rail costs are 40% higher than four European nations; a shocking statistic that came out in the same interview.
In Birmingham and the Black Country, we have 38 miles of unused and underused double track rail lines around our own New Street Station that is the UK's no 1 rail congestion bottleneck! Yet again, we model ourselves on America instead of Europe and get into such a state about being members of Europe. This is all complete madness yet, we have no insight into our insanity!
Let those four European countries run our rail network to bring it up to their standard of excellence. It does not mean being ruled by them but having the humility to be shown how to do things better by Europe and not by our good friends in America.
All this shows that we need more union with Europe, not less! Let us distance ourselves from America's bad examples and learn from our immediate neighbour, Europe.
One 'Thought for the Day' contributor (on Radio 4's 'Today') said we have attacked or bombed or occupied 23 countries since the end of the 2nd World War. Caroline Lucas MP related part of the full list on 'Any Questions' and not one other panelist disagreed with her. If our friend and ally, Israel is included, it is even more than this, of course. Leonie and Emily, Yr 11 pupils at Lambeth Academy, seemed to think that the UK in its time, had NOT invaded only 22 out of nearly 200 countries in the world!! (Radio 4's 'BH' on 20 January 2013 in an amusing piece called 'Teenagers Fight Back')
After all that, not surprisingly, the White House would like us to stay in the EU to continue to represent the Anglo-American world view and to keep
The European Courts of Justice and of Human Rights, alone makes our membership of the European Union worthwhile. Officially leave the EU and we lose them both.
Europe has a transport system that is much better than ours. We would do well to learn how they do their superb railway system, instead of ours being like the poor American rail network. Chief Executive of Network Rail, Sir David Higgins said on 'Today' on the 8 January 2013, "We still have a Victorian rail network ... we have 500 Victorian signal boxes." The McNulty Report of 2010 stated that our rail costs are 40% higher than four European nations; a shocking statistic that came out in the same interview.
In Birmingham and the Black Country, we have 38 miles of unused and underused double track rail lines around our own New Street Station that is the UK's no 1 rail congestion bottleneck! Yet again, we model ourselves on America instead of Europe and get into such a state about being members of Europe. This is all complete madness yet, we have no insight into our insanity!
Let those four European countries run our rail network to bring it up to their standard of excellence. It does not mean being ruled by them but having the humility to be shown how to do things better by Europe and not by our good friends in America.
All this shows that we need more union with Europe, not less! Let us distance ourselves from America's bad examples and learn from our immediate neighbour, Europe.
Labels:
'Any Questions',
'BH',
aggression,
American,
Caroline Lucas,
European Court,
Israel,
Lambeth Academy,
Radio 4
Monday, 26 November 2012
For Israel, attack is the best form of defence
Israel only ever tries violence, terrorism and targeted assassination as the best forms of defence.
The nation was born in 1948 out of Israeli violence and terrorism against the British. Terrorism was rewarded and its attacks and aggression on its neighbouring countries since then hardly endeared it to those nations. An Israeli promotional film, I recently saw at church, actually admitted it was surrounded by enemies, as if this was something to be proud of rather than ashamed of, as a sign of failure.After 64 years, I would have thought Israel would have tried a different strategy to win friends and influence people - even if this was only out of sheer self-interest to improve its security and future prospects. But, then, it is an outpost of what the Palestinians see as the loathed USA/West in the very heart of the Arab/Muslim Middle East. So, what more can one expect from Israel/USA/UK than continued warfare to ratchet up the hatred, to never bring peace with justice for either Israel or Palestine?
Monday, 22 November 2010
Quran v Bible; Islam v Christianity
My motivation for reading the Koran was to get to the truth about the widespread assertion that the Koran tells Muslims to go out and kill the infidels (the unbelievers). In addition, as Muslims believe that Jesus is a great prophet, do they then follow his teaching in the Sermon on the Mount about loving enemies, turning the other cheek and being a peacemaker rather than a warmonger? (Not that the followers of Jesus, themselves, have been zealous in following this particular teaching for the last 1,700 years.)
This is the Jesus who was non-violent and non-aggressive in all he said and did. The irony is that the faith where Jesus is the most central is by far and away the most violent and aggressive when comparing the track record of Muslim and Christian nations over the last 1,400 years. The evidence for this is found on my blog and, in particular, in my piece, "Islam is all sweetness and light when ... " Both Islam and Christianity accept violence/aggression as perfectly acceptable from time to time, especially for self-defence. Having now read both the Koran and the Bible, the Bible, thanks to the Old Testament, is clearly the winner with the prize of most bloodshed.
Today, I finished reading the Koran (over 600 pages). Rather heavy going and nothing much that anyone could possibly take exception to. Lots of "God is Forgiving and Merciful" and being condemnatory of the unbelievers and polytheists and hypocrites. Old Testament characters and Jesus are given a similar treatment as we have in the Bible, except that Jesus is not the Son of God or divine, of course.
There were no stories of blood and gore, either, as you get in the Bible. No killing of unbelievers (infidels), except in self defence or when they are persecuting the Muslims. "Kill those who war against you." No holy war, either that we get in Deuteronomy ch 20 v 1-20 with the rules for waging holy war! The word, 'paradise' was never found, nor was that pernicious idea of suicide bombing to go straight to paradise. The nearest word to paradise was heaven and the Garden. However, I did find the following:
"And those who are slain in the way of God, He renders not their actions vain. He will guide them and improve their state and bring them into the Garden, which He has made known to them." Surah 47: 4-6. Also, Surah 4: 74, below.
Earlier in verse 4 in this Surah we read that, after battle against unbelievers, to show "either grace or ransom till the war lays down its burdens." Grace, I suppose, meaning showing forgiveness and mercy and releasing prisoners or, ransoming prisoners of war, perhaps.
One good verse about "Assuredly, the creation of the heavens and the earth is greater than the creation of humankind" Surah 40 v 57. And, my translation had humankind, too and not mankind. This is good, for me, if the verse means that the heavens and the earth will outlive humans and, if it means that we need to stop the deterioration of the earth's life support systems from human activities. This verse got the nearest to humans needing to follow the principles of stewardship of the planet. Stewardship of the earth's resources is also not found in the Bible - only plenty of references to people being stewards or servants. Sharing/equality (aka the Marx/Engels idea) is found in 2 Corinthians 8 v 13-15. Again, in contrast, the Bible has humans being greater than every other living thing (in Genesis 1) and being free to do as they will with the earth's resources and everything on it ("dominion over").
Quotations on the subject of Islamic warfare or, what we prefer to call, Islamic terrorism:
Surah 2: 190-193 "Fight in the way of God against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! God loves not aggressors. ... if they attack you then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers. But if they desist, then lo! God is Forgiving, Merciful. And fight them until persecution is no more."
Surah 2: 216 "Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful to you."
Surah 2: 217 "Warfare (in the sacred month) is a great transgression. ... And they will not cease from fighting against you until they have made you apostates from your religion, if they can" (This is what NATO - the traditional Christian nations of N America and W. Europe - is doing in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Pakistan border. In addition, on the backs of the military, are the Christian missionaries working hard to save Muslims as they turn from Islam to Christ or, to make them 'apostates' from their religion.)
Surah 3: 199-200 "Be patient and outdo your enemy in patience, be ready and fear God, in order that you may succeed."
Surah 4: 29-30 "... and kill not one another. Lo! God is ever Merciful to you. Whoever does that through aggression and injustice, We shall cast him into Fire, and that is ever easy for God."
Surah 4: 74 "Let those fight in the way of God who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoever fights in the way of God, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." (not a harem of virgins in Paradise for the men and nothing for the women suicide bombers, as is commonly supposed by non-Muslims - and some Muslims, too!)
Surah 4: 75-76 "How should you not fight for the cause of God and of the feeble among men and of the women and the children who are crying, 'Our Lord!'. Bring us forth from out this town of which the people are oppressors! Oh give us from you some protector! Oh, give us from you some defender! Those who believe do battle for the cause of God; and those who disbelieve do battle for the cause of idols. So fight the minions of Satan." (this appears to reflect a time when Muslims were being persecuted)
Surah 4: 84 "So fight (O Muhammad) in the way of God. ... Perhaps God will restrain the might of those who disbelieve. God is stronger in might and stronger at inflicting punishment." (appears that the Muslims were suffering at the time of these writings)
Surah 4: 88-89 "... if they (self: unbelievers) turn back to enmity then take them and kill them wherever you find them, and choose neither protector nor helper from among them." (killing only in self-defence is allowed)
Surah 4: 90-91 "If they keep not aloof from you nor offer you peace nor hold their hands (self: nor hold back from killing Muslims), then take them and kill them wherever you find them. Against such We have given you clear warrant."
Surah 4: 100-101 " ... it is no sin for you to curtail your worship if you fear that those who disbelieve may attack you. In truth, the disbelievers are an open enemy to you."
Surah 7: 55-56 "(O People!) Call upon your Lord humbly and in secret. Lo! He loves not aggressors."
Surah 47: 4-6 "Now when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then it is smiting of the necks until, when you have routed them, then making fast of bonds; and afterward either grace or ransom till the war lays down its burdens. ... He may try some of you by means of others. And those who are slain in the way of God, He renders not their actions vain. He will guide them and improve their state, and bring them into the Garden, which He has made known to them."
Quotations about men/women:
Surah 2:228 "Women have rights similar to those of men over them in a just manner and men are a degree above them. God is Mighty, Wise."
Surah 4:26-28 "God would make the burden light for you, for man was created weak." (However, 'man' here, probably means men and women.)
Quotation about Abraham (Muslims, Christians and Jews are all children of Abraham or, all descended from him)
"Abraham was not a Jew, nor yet a Christian; but he was true Muslim, and he was not of the polytheists."
The Quran on manslaughter
Surah 5: 32 "We decreed for the Children of Israel that whosoever kills a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had killed all human kind, and whoever saves the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all humankind."
The Quran on Judaism and the Bible
Surah 5: 67-69 "O People of the Scripture! You have nothing (of guidance) till you observe the Torah and the Gospel. ... Lo! Those who believe and those who are Jews and Sabaeans and Christians - whosoever believes in God and the Last Day and does right - no fear shall come upon them neither shall they grieve."
Tim Weller 21 November 2010
Labels:
aggression,
Bible,
Christians,
infidel,
Jesus,
Koran,
Muslims,
prophet,
Quran,
self-defence,
violence
Thursday, 8 May 2008
9/11 - Tutu called it a criminal act
'Time' magazine wrote: "If you want to humble an empire it makes sense to maim its cathedrals. They are symbols of its faith ... The Twin Towers and the Pentagon ... are the sanctuaries of money and power that our enemies may imagine define us. But that assumes our faith rests on what we can buy and build, and that has never been America's true God."
However, I think it is what a nation does and not its spiritual or Christian faith beliefs that defines it and that it is judged by. "By their (rich) fruits shall ye know them", declared the Lord and Master of a higher proportion of Americans than any other nation. Riches for the richest nation on earth is contrary to the teaching and practice of their Lord and Master, who had no permanent home but was an itinerant preacher. Riches that have come from an abundance of its own natural resources, certainly but also by decades of running the world's structures and systems for its own material and military advantage.
It is richly ironic that for the nation that is fullest with the Lord's disciples should be the most powerful economically and militarily. This is completely contrary to the life and teaching of the Man for Others, the Servant of all and who came into Jerusalem for the last time not on a war horse but, non-violently, on a donkey.
America's true God is not the God, Jesus, of the Sermon on the Mount and who told the disciple Peter to put away his sword. It is, in fact, the wealth and vast military power that enables it to show that might is right on the world stage by keeping the weak and powerless, like Jesus, well under its dictatorial thumb.
The Anglo/American/Israeli hegemony is well and truly in charge. Indeed, Israel is the regional super-power and is funded by the devout US. Yet, the Jew who was the founder of America's Christian faith rejected the Devil's offer to give him all the kingdoms of the world if only he were to bow down to him. The most devout nation on earth, with its closest allies - the UK and Israel - has warmly embraced that offer! It has fallen at the feet of the devil. It is a fallen nation. Its crimes of aggression that come out of its empire, its imperialistic nature, its colonial ways, invite a similar response from the victims of its false God of money and power. For America's victims, revenge is so, so sweet.
However, I think it is what a nation does and not its spiritual or Christian faith beliefs that defines it and that it is judged by. "By their (rich) fruits shall ye know them", declared the Lord and Master of a higher proportion of Americans than any other nation. Riches for the richest nation on earth is contrary to the teaching and practice of their Lord and Master, who had no permanent home but was an itinerant preacher. Riches that have come from an abundance of its own natural resources, certainly but also by decades of running the world's structures and systems for its own material and military advantage.
It is richly ironic that for the nation that is fullest with the Lord's disciples should be the most powerful economically and militarily. This is completely contrary to the life and teaching of the Man for Others, the Servant of all and who came into Jerusalem for the last time not on a war horse but, non-violently, on a donkey.
America's true God is not the God, Jesus, of the Sermon on the Mount and who told the disciple Peter to put away his sword. It is, in fact, the wealth and vast military power that enables it to show that might is right on the world stage by keeping the weak and powerless, like Jesus, well under its dictatorial thumb.
The Anglo/American/Israeli hegemony is well and truly in charge. Indeed, Israel is the regional super-power and is funded by the devout US. Yet, the Jew who was the founder of America's Christian faith rejected the Devil's offer to give him all the kingdoms of the world if only he were to bow down to him. The most devout nation on earth, with its closest allies - the UK and Israel - has warmly embraced that offer! It has fallen at the feet of the devil. It is a fallen nation. Its crimes of aggression that come out of its empire, its imperialistic nature, its colonial ways, invite a similar response from the victims of its false God of money and power. For America's victims, revenge is so, so sweet.
Labels:
'Time' magazine,
aggression,
Empire,
faith,
fallen nation,
God,
hegemony,
Israel,
Pentagon,
revenge,
Tutu,
Twin Towers,
UK
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)