Showing posts with label Warwick Manufacturing Group. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Warwick Manufacturing Group. Show all posts

Monday, 23 November 2020

Warwick Manufacturing Group is CORRECT; Head of Metro Development is WRONG!

from Peter Adams, Head of Metro Development, 5 Dec 2016 Tim Weller's rebuttal in blue.

 

"The e-mail below by Dr Mallinson of Warwick Manufacturing Group has been brought to my attention.

Dr Mallinson is incorrect to state that “the arrival of metro using the South Staffordshire alignment dictates that heavy rail passenger services are no longer possible.”  I continue to maintain how very right Nick Mallinson is.  The tram train is NOT a “heavy rail passenger service”. To say so is being dishonest.

The current Wednesbury – Brierley Hill light rail proposals would not prevent the Stourbridge - Walsall route reopening for conventional freight and passenger train services in the longer term, as they will be designed to allow passive provision for future conversion to shared running of trams and trains on the corridor. Passive provision for only another kind of tram - the tram train over 20 Kms that still excludes the wasted 36 Kms mainline between Walsall and Burton on Trent.  It is most misleading to call the tram train as a “conventional passenger train service”.

 

The practicality of this can be demonstrated by the fact that shared running of trains and tram services over the same infrastructure already occurs elsewhere in Europe and is shortly to be introduced between Sheffield and Rotherham."

 

This is a photo of the tram train that is being introduced on the short 12 Kms between Sheffield Cathedral and Rotherham Parkgate.  It is not suitable on a fast mainline 120 Kms railway, as Peter thinks.



Peter writes about The current Wednesbury – Brierley Hill light rail proposals would not prevent the Stourbridge - Walsall route reopening for conventional freight and passenger train services in the longer term”.  His closing sentence reveals that by that he means the tram train that is being used on the 12 Kms between Sheffield and Rotherham.  It is NOT a conventional passenger train.  It must stop at every 14 tram stops to maintain the frequency that passengers have grown accustomed to with the trams.  Therefore, using it on our 120 Kms Black Country mainline is like putting London Underground trains on the London to Paris HS1 line.  Thinkable only for a certain kind of peculiar mind set.

 

Railway trains go on railway lines.  Do it, please, for every sensible reason in the book and so help bring our “very old Victorian railway” (Sir Peter Hendy) into the modern age! The Brits, last year, sold 14 electric hydrogen trains to Germany. Use them to complete the Black Country Railway - in style.


​​
​​

Tim Weller

Monday, 23 October 2017

The Land of Make Believe or, You Can't Make This Up if You Tried!

The Land of Make Believe or, You Can't Make This Up if You Tried!

This must be the biggest and longest running scandal in UK transport history -passenger trains kept off freight only railway lines and mothballed (or, 'out of use' designation ignored), alongside traffic choked roads and motorways!

This is all about the four Black Country boroughs and, supposedly, the Second (worst polluted) City in the land.  The Black Country and Birmingham - both bereft of sense; abounding in idiocy and bursting with incompetence.  Here are 40 points as the evidence for such a scathing but accurate description.  There is even more sad evidence - Metro One and Snow Hill Station - that I have not included, here (but see ** at foot).
I think, the excuse for inaction and wrong action by the railway experts at Network Fail is, "Well, we have to spend all our days writing reports, strategies and studies, don’t we?  Don’t blame us.  We’re just doing our job".  Thus, they end up:
  1. ​Running homes, cars and shops ​down urban railway lines alongside main roads with bumper to bumper traffic (very mixed up kids run our transport, here in the West Midlands).
  2. Putting Homebase on Kings Heath railway station, while still running some passenger trains on the line!
  3. Forgetting to put trains and stations on the UK's only, it's all there, unused but easily reinstated, double track, mainline, strategic railway.
  4. Even the Ordnance Survey think it is a working railway line in the Black Country section!  See all their latest maps.
  5. Spending many millions of pounds on the underpasses and bridges as main roads have been widened and motorways built to cross this same strategic railway of phantom trains and invisible stations.  
  6. In 2014, planning a test track for 2 Kms on the same unfinished, 120 Kms mainline railway to shuttle passengers to the next mainline in the neighbouring borough!
  7. Then being told, "But we want it for Metro trams and have done so since the early 1980s."  This was in 2015.
  8. These idiots - sorry, experts at Dudley Council - should have known that.
  9. "Well," they said, "We'll just have to send the test track in the opposite direction through Dudley Castle Hill tunnel, then."
  10. Next, putting it about that they have only done so because the test track needed the 'not one brick out of place', double track railway tunnel all along!
  11. So why did the Warwick Manufacturing Group not tell them that in the first place?  Or, was someone lying?
  12. Building a monorail at Merry Hill Shopping Centre in the late 1980s and failing to connect it to the unfinished, with all the double tracks in place, 120 Kms mainline railway - the Black Country Railway, as I call it.  It fell short by 400 metres!
  13. The monorail was built by the foremost and well respected Swiss engineering company, Von Roll.  But they closed it after about two or three years in the early 1990s.
  14. Next, they sold it and reports indicated it went to Sydney.
  15. Our railway experts spent £750 million (of railway money?) "to enhance the passenger experience" at New Street Station.  Quote is courtesy of David Golding of Network Rail in a phone conversation with me in 2014 or 2015.
  16. Now called 'Grand Central Shopping Centre and Diesel Perfumed Station Tagged Along as an Afterthought in the Basement of the John Lewis Store'.
  17. GCSC&DPSTAAAAITBOTJLS for short!
  18. This must make it the longest name for a railway station outside Anglesey.
  19. The longest name and the longest waits for trains!
  20. Because, they are still failing to build the additional railway tunnels at both approaches to GCSC&DPSTAAAAITBOTJLS.
  21. Negligent Rail failed to do so even when all the buildings above the existing tunnels had been razed to the ground!
  22. And, twice too - at first Brindleyplace (80s/90s) and, then, when the Bull Ring Shopping Centre was rebuilt (90s/00s).
  23. Failing to realise that they could have then, easily, put in the cut and cover tunnels (and even additional platforms, according to Railfuture).
  24. Failing to twig that they could have "enhanced the passenger experience" by getting railway customers away on their trains more quickly and efficiently by building the tunnels and platforms when the obvious opportunities arose.
  25. Illiterate economics in replacing buses and trains with electric trams at 4 to 14 times per Km more expensively than simply using diesel trains on important railway lines.
  26. Each new tram is ten times more expensive than a new bus.  (FoI answer)
  27. Only local "bus on rails" * trams ever go on railway lines; rarely, regional and national trains.  (the rarity was the 6 Kms from Smethwick Galton Bridge to Moor Street Sta; and, Walsall to Rugeley - but, this took 50 years!)
  28. 11 Km Wolverhampton to Walsall railway line was tried but it was never extended to Brum via Sutton Park or to Derby via Lichfield and, therefore never got enough passengers.
  29. It has been closed for some years but, it is this 11 Km that they want to resurrect, a second time, rather than returning the trains and stations to the unused 56 Kms out of the 120 Km Black Country Railway.
  30. We run trees, trams, a test track and goods trains on our 120 Km Black Country Railway.  Aren't we clever?  (Actually, 64 Kms are normal with useful passenger trains.  56 Kms only are wasted or destined to have slow, "bus on rails" * trams!)
  31. We can't blame Beeching.  Only today’s transport experts.  Simply because train services that were hardly used in the 60s should have been mothballed and not sold off, piece meal and lost for ever.  What complete stupidity!  The railway industry is wet behind the ears; is walked all over and, yet even today, good transport infrastructure is still wasted!
  32. Our local and regional transport bosses are all subservient to Network Rail.
  33. When this mighty organisation tells them that they don’t need the Black Country Railway until the 2040s, at the earliest, and then only for freight, the other transport bosses roll over, meekly accept it and start (in the 1980s) to turn it into a tram line!
  34. Wasted and many kilometres of destroyed railway lines are the everyday business of Network Rail.  This government agency in the public sector has no interest in its own infrastructure so local and regional transport bosses come along and take over the railway lines from them to use as tram lines, housing, shops, test tracks and linear woodland!
  35. See ‘The Times’ report of 12 October 2017 by Graeme Paton, ‘Network Rail’s upgrades monopoly shunted aside’.
  36. Our, “still a very old Victorian railway” was spoken about by Sir David Higgins, Chief Executive of Network Rail on the ‘Today’ programme on 8 January 2013!
  37. He mentioned, “500 Victorian signal boxes and 300 are from the 1960s”.
  38. He spoke, in 2013, of Network Rail having £37 billion to spend in one year.  Now, ‘The Times’ report has, “Government investment in the railways of £4.2 billion was the lowest level in 15 years.”
  39. Yet, the budget on defending the UK from attack by foreign forces is now 2% of GDP and is going up, in real terms, by 0.5% in every year of the present administration!!  (BBC ‘Today’ website earlier in the year)
  40. Thus, top priority for two new aircraft carriers (£7 billion) that are the biggest and best ever but, now need a flotilla of warships around them for protection.

* as used by one Director from UK Tram Ltd and the Croydon MP on the Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme, the day after the Croydon tram crash that killed seven passengers in November 2016.

** Metro Two, the extension that cost over £60 million/Km to take it to Grand Central Shopping Centre and Diesel Perfumed Basement Station means that there is no longer a tram stop for Snow Hill Station - since 2016.  The tram bypasses Snow Hill completely and goes straight to Grand Central.  Yet, it was built to connect Snow Hill with Grand Central!  Platform 4 at Snow Hill Station is still wasted and unused.  It would still be in use to this day if they had only put back the much more cost effective, financially prudent and responsible trains all the way to Wolverhampton Low Level Station (now no more).

Metro Three to Edgbaston is costing £75 million/Km for the 2 Kms to the west of Five Ways from Grand Central.  Putting diesel trains back on our Black Country and Brum 106 Kms of mothballed/wasted or freight only railway lines would could cost no more than £6 m/Km, according to the 2015 Borders Railway rebuilding (not needed for ours) to the middle of nowhere in the back of beyond but, beautiful Southern Uplands.

Tim Weller 14 October 2017

Thursday, 26 March 2015

Dudley CAN have a direct connection with London and Scotland!

Please try and persuade Khurshid that Dudley having a direct connection with all parts of the UK, as we used to have for about 100 years, is more sensible and advantageous than having a tram shuttling passengers between Dudley Castle Hill and Dudley Port on the West Coast Main Line and then having to go via Brum or Wolverhampton to other parts of the country.  Additional points:
  • The ultra-light rail tram (VLR) idea appears to be a project at Warwick University in Coventry from the Warwick Manufacturing Group, there.
  • It still has to be developed, tested and then to pass all the H&SE requirements before it can come into public service on our major inter-city line.  This will take years from past experience with the Stourbridge Shuttle. 
  • It will be a refinement of the 3/4 mile tram that is the Stourbridge Shuttle - ideal for that short branch line but NOT on a nationally important, last remaining, unopened, north-south, double track line!
  • There is no other (opened or unopened) north-south line between road and rail congested New Street Station in the east and the Hereford-Shrewsbury line in the west.
  • The VLR would stop, for ever, inter-city trains using the Black Country Line, once more
  • One mile, for now, for the tram between Castle Hill and Dudley Port and then extensions in small bite sized chunks.
  • The bite size chunks strategy failed to get Light Rail Metro (LR) trams on this same line.  Now, Khurshid wants VLR trams as well or instead - and, using the same failed strategy!
  • Khurshid and his predecessors failed in 34 years to get LR Metro between Wednesbury and Brierley Hill - a distance of 7 miles.  Now Khurshid is trying with getting VLR trams on only one mile!
  • His plan will cost £20 to £25 million; mine will cost under £200 million, even with £10 million spent on Parkhead rail Viaduct in Netherton (figure from Toby Rackcliffe of Centro).
  • My figure is based on the £300 million for the 48 Km (29 miles) line from Edinburgh to the middle of nowhere in southern Scotland (a small community at Tweedbank) - I exaggerate not!  It re-opens in September.
  • This is a big enough scandal in its own right when we constantly get passed over for even a 7 mile tram on this former 13 miles inter-city line!
  • Khurshid's plan is for one mile; mine is for 13 miles.  Therefore, mine is better value for money! 
  • Bridges, one viaduct and one tunnel (all of which cannot be widened) prevent shared use of VLR and heavy rail inter-city trains.
  • For about 20 years, DfT, PTA/Centro and Network Rail official transport policy - in every single document - was for freight trains, only on the full length and LR Metro on the seven miles middle section.
  • Now, all of that is over-ruled by Martyn Holloway, Head of Traffic and Transportation in Dudley Council, advising Khurshid that every single strategy and study, policy and plan - written and poured over for years by transport officials - can be walked all over!
  • Martyn should have known that the far more sensible and suitable site for the VLR project and Innovation Centre is the vacant Brierley Hill Steel Terminal site on Moor Street and using the mothballed, 3 Km, Pensnett branch line.
  • The VLR tram then road running to the Waterfront and Merry Hill and, a second line road running to connect with the Stourbridge Shuttle at Stourbridge Town interchange.
  • There has never been any public consultation over this weird and wonderful idea from Khurshid and Pete Lowe.